So long as there are rapacious billionaires and corrupt politicians hoarding wealth and making life depressing for the much less lucky, there’ll at all times be a necessity for the Robin Hood folks story. The Sherwood Forest-dwelling outlaw who stole from the wealthy and gave to the poor has been depicted in movies since Douglas Fairbanks slung a bow over his shoulder and strapped on a spiffy pair of tights within the 1922 landmark silent manufacturing “Robin Hood.” Michael Curtiz delivered what nonetheless stands because the platonic excellent of a Robin Hood film in 1938 with the Errol Flynn-starring “The Adventures of Robin Hood,” however there have been different worthy takes on the character through the years, most notably Disney’s 1973 animated movie “Robin Hood” and Richard Lester’s poignant 1976 romance “Robin and Marian” starring Sean Connery and Audrey Hepburn.
For many fashionable audiences, essentially the most well-known rendition of the Robin Hood saga is 1991’s “Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves.” Kevin Costner was arguably essentially the most in-demand star in Hollywood on the time of its launch, and he delivered in a giant method for Warner Bros. with a worldwide field workplace gross of $391 million ($905 million in 2024 {dollars}) — this regardless of the precise movie not being any good (Michael Kamen’s heroic rating excepted)!
The issue is sort of clearly the screenplay, which was so terrible Alan Rickman secretly recruited playwright Peter Barnes and comic Ruby Wax to concoct some good villainous strains for his portrayal of the depraved Sheriff of Nottingham. Costner additionally had issues with the “Prince of Thieves” script and initially turned the movie down earlier than a sure factor of the manufacturing proved enticing sufficient to get him to signal on.
It took one other Kevin to get Costner to signal on for Prince of Thieves
In a 1991 Leisure Weekly function on the turbulent making of “Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves,” Costner revealed that the hiring of director Kevin Reynolds was the clincher for him. In accordance with the star:
“I felt Kevin was such a very good filmmaker I might do it. I would by no means dreamed of doing a film like this, however I believed this was a special Robin Hood. It advised the story in a brand new method, with out repeating it or making a joke of it.”
In case you’re questioning why Reynolds, who would go on to direct Costner in one other troubled-yet-successful movie, “Waterworld,” was such a draw for him, you need to return to his pre-stardom look in “Fandango” (which made /Movie’s listing of Costner’s high 14 performances). The 1985 fraternity comedy was Reynolds’ feature-directing debut barely obtained a theatrical launch 39 years in the past as a result of Steven Spielberg, whose Amblin Leisure backed it, was sad with the completed film. It is since acquired a cult following, however the failure harm Reynolds. Additionally injurious to his profession was the additionally barely-released “The Beast,” a gripping journey a couple of Soviet soldier who assists a Afghani combatant in searching down the tank that destroyed the latter’s village.
Costner nonetheless believed in Reynolds, who knew he wanted his former star’s help if he wished to proceed on along with his directing profession. “I would carried out two footage that hadn’t made a dime,” Reynolds advised EW, “So I type of knew they wished me due to my connections with Kevin.”
The excellent news is that the success broke Reynolds out of director jail and allowed him to helm the infinitely superior “Waterworld” 4 years later. Does that offset the wretchedness of “Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves,” one of many worst blockbusters of its period? I am going to fortunately take heed to arguments for and in opposition to, however provided that they’re articulated in a hilariously terrible British accent.